Thursday 28 April 2011

New online journal by University of Worcester Professors-First online free-access research journal in its field

hive-worcester

A new online journal is being launched to give sport, exercise and physical education students around the world an outlet for their research.

The Graduate Journal of Sport, Exercise and Physical Education and  Research (GJSEPER) will be the first online free-access research journal in the field to solely publish student-led research.

The journal was the idea of Professor Derek Peters, Dr Gyozo Molnar and Professor Ken Hardman at the University of Worcester.

They will act as the editorial board for the resource.

It will be an expert-reviewed journal with submissions only eligible if the first named author is (or has recently been) a student.

The first issue will be published in Autumn.

Journal

Worcester Evening News April 27th 2011

 

 

Worcester Students Event

hive-worcester

Students can get up to 20% off young fashion brands at a special House of Frazer event on Thursday May 5th.  The Worcester store is holding a student lock-in from 6pm, where those with a valid university, college or sexth form ID or NUS card will be able to attend.

Worcester News, 27 April 2011

Tuesday 26 April 2011

Fake Diplomas

hive-worcester

Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE

If you’re looking for a degree program online, there are plenty of excellent schools that offer distance learning. Traditional schools are putting more courses online, up to and including four-year undergraduate and graduate degree programs. However, this field has its darker side. If you aren’t yet familiar with diploma mills, it’s wise to be aware of them so that your hard-earned education money gets you what it should – a valid degree.

One element that distinguishes a reputable online degree program from a diploma mill is accreditation. Schools that want their credits to be readily transferable both online and to traditional universities typically seek accreditation from one of six regional accreditation agencies. These regional agencies vet colleges and universities according to the same standards that traditional on-campus universities use.

Not every school chooses accreditation, but that doesn’t mean the school in question is a diploma mill. Some schools are still in the review process, especially as education online is such a rapidly growing field. New online universities simply haven’t had the chance to go through the entire process. Other schools may feel that their name is accreditation enough; private universities with wide renown may choose this option.

Still other schools maintain a relationship with other accreditation services. Research your school’s status either at the U. S. Department of Education’s Database of Accredited Institutions and Programs or even with a search of the university’s web site itself. An accredited university will typically display their accreditation prominently as a point of pride. When you check the Department of Education database, check the name of the listed college or university carefully, as diploma mills sometimes borrow another university’s good name.

A diploma mill might seem like a tempting offer. Perhaps you know your job, and are the best in the state, but not having a diploma to prove your knowledge. Unfortunately, the diploma that you would get from a diploma mill is more likely to taint your CV – or résumé – than to enhance it. Employers are aware of diploma mills and check into an applicant’s background enough to spot a tissue-paper diploma.

Be Wary of…

Still unsure about the university you’re considering? Here are some signs to look for:

§  The school offers unbelievably short degree programs. If the school promises to deliver a four-year degree in six months, don’t buy the hype, or the steep fees.

§  They promise to give you credit for “life experience.” Legitimate universities do this too, but they require ample proof of your experience before they give bona fide credit . A school that only wants you to write a list of experiences is probably a mill.

§  Their website is barren of important information such as the dean’s name, professors’ names, a phone number, a full address, or a university’s edu extension.

§  Their name is a bit too similar to that of a famous university. For example, “John Hopkin University” is almost definitely a mill, leaching off the good name of the prestigious Johns Hopkins.

§  They demand a lump sum instead of charging tuition per credit hour.

§  They boast “accreditation” that, upon further inspection, seems to be issued by the school itself and not a trustworthy outside agency.

The Good News Is

It may take a bit longer to earn your degree through an accredited program even if you’re able to work at your own speed with online education, but you’ll be assured of the quality of your credentials. A degree should mean more than simply a piece of paper to fatten a résumé. It will be valid and recognized if it comes from from a reputable or accredited institution. Accreditation also means that you’ll be able to transfer those credits freely, either to another online degree program or to a traditional on-campus learning environment. Pay for an education, not just a gilded paper with your name on it; you’ll be glad you did.

 

Author: SalieThreewit 

Friday 22 April 2011

Secure work at the London 2012 Olympics

Hive-Worcester

Colleges are training stewards for London 2012 in a link-up with the security industry

If you're planning to fetch up at any of the Olympic or Paralympic venues next summer, it's likely that sporting prowess rather than security concerns will be at the forefront of your mind.

But ensuring that London 2012 events are safe for spectators and competitors will require about 10,000 security personnel, which poses something of a challenge for organisers – where are all these qualified stewards going to come from?

Further education colleges are providing the answer.

Uzi Khan, 18, is studying for a level 3 BTec in health and social care at North Hertfordshire College. He has also got a weekend job that he loves, as a bouncer – or door supervisor, to give it its more formal title – at a local pub.

Khan is one of 85,000 college students and unemployed people who have undertaken accredited security industry training over the last two years in an initiative spearheaded by North Hertfordshire College. Known as Bridging the Gap, the scheme is a partnership between the Games organisers, UK security industry representative bodies and North Hertfordshire College to bring thousands of new recruits into the security industry in time for the Games next July.

Students who complete the basic course in understanding security at spectator events (USSE), usually offered alongside their core college curriculum, can then go on to gain the more rigorous door supervisor qualification.

"We start with 16-year-olds who do the USSE training while they're in full-time education," explains Michael Wright, executive director for education at Bridging the Gap. "Usually the course is offered to students studying on public services courses or those with a public service aspect." It is a qualification that makes them "instantly employable", he says.

Khan has passed both qualifications and says he'll definitely apply for a job at the Games – security is one of the few paid, rather than volunteer, short-term roles available.

"On the first course, the most interesting part was the real-life scenarios we studied and the roleplay," says Khan.

"We also looked at how things shouldn't be managed, like a football stadium when it collapsed and door supervisors when they cause conflict and end up in court."

In addition to his weekend job, Khan recently volunteered as a steward at a conference that explored the role of further and higher education providers in London 2012. The work experience he has gained has developed his confidence, interpersonal skills and initiative, he says – all qualities that should make him attractive to any employer, and not just those in the security sector.

"It's such a great job, security," enthuses fellow student Josh Rothon, 17, who is studying for a BTec in public services at East Norfolk College. He hopes to work either in the security industry or to join the army. Having completed both qualifications, he's now just waiting for his door supervisor's badge to come through.

"The courses were brilliant. We did a lot about teamwork, and it built your confidence up, which is what you need in security," he says.

"The most interesting part was when we went to the Norfolk Show as stewards to get practical experience. Dealing with the public meant we met lots of colourful characters. We did the Great British Cycle Race too, which involved basic stewarding duties, handling the car park and entrances, and giving directions."

Much of the training, Rothon explains, "is to help you avoid getting on people's nerves, and learn to be calm in how you talk to people". He has also learned how to evaluate body language to predict how a crowd might react.

The opportunity to enhance students' future employability is what most interested Fintan Donohue, principal of North Hertfordshire College, when he was first approached with the idea of colleges providing training in the security skills required for London 2012.

"I had no idea of how transformational it could be for FE students," he explains. "But the Olympics contractor, G4S, is the second largest private employer in the world – and at that point we had no relationship with them. Now, some 8,000 college students will be employed by them."

But the "real legacy story", he says, is that the initiative is connecting young people to part-time employment and training in tough economic times.

The wages for part-time work aren't at all bad for a student trying to augment their income, says Khan – between £8 and £15 an hour depending on the role.

And although the image of security may need a bit of burnishing (Khan acknowledges that doormen, for instance, often have a poor reputation), there is no doubt that the sector offers fascinating career options. G4S protects rock stars and sport stars, secures iconic buildings, ensures safety at ports and airports, and manages the security at major entertainment, political and business events worldwide.

With opportunities for international travel, excitement, variety and responsibility, it is hardly surprising that Khan has been keen to gain further qualifications in first aid, drugs awareness, child protection, safeguarding and behavioural management to boost his CV.

But how are qualified students going to get jobs at the Games? Part of the deal with colleges is that any FE student who has completed the USSE qualification and wants to apply for a security job at London 2012 is guaranteed an interview. Those who are selected will participate in some of the 40 live test events that will take place before the Games kick off.

Kim Barry, 19, who is currently studying uniformed public services at Fareham College, is hoping that she'll get the chance to try out for an Olympics role.

She did her USSE work experience at a football match. "It was overwhelming! I won't lie, we were all nervous beforehand and really on our toes. But the atmosphere, the crowd, you just go away buzzing."

There's likely to be a similar buzz, she says, when she volunteers as a steward later this month at the royal wedding. Barry, Khan and Rothon are all clearly grasping the opportunity they have been given with both hands, but, says Donohue, there's a long-term vision for this model of training FE students in industry-accredited qualifications that goes beyond the security sector – in events, catering and technology.

"If we get this right we believe that industry employers will come to colleges over the next decade, as a single point where they can recruit," he says. "It has the potential to create a prototype and to transform the relationship between industries and colleges."

Louise Tickle

guardian.co.uk

Tuesday 19 April 2011

Worcester County Council's sale of rare books nets £237,145

Hive-Worcester

THE county council has raised £237,145 from its rare and old book auctions after calling a halt to the sales following withering criticism of the process.

The figure is the total amount raised following a series of book auctions.

In the final sale, 30 lots of Worcestershire County Council books, mostly on travel and topography, were sold at Dominic Winter auction house in Gloucestershire yesterday.

High estimates on the books had auction experts expecting £16,000 on all the lots but brisk bidding raised £18,770, even though four lots failed to sell.

Critics have blasted the council’s decision to sell the books saying they were done without public knowledge nor full discussions with interested parties.

The council claims the auctions are to streamline book stocks ready for a move from Worcester’s Foregate Street library to the Hive in the Butts, saying they were under a legal duty to provide a “comprehensive and efficient” library service. However, they yesterday suspended further sales, pledging to discuss any public concerns.

Auction house experts who catalogued the lots said that many of the books would have cost more than their value to rebind, and they were only of any value to collectors and speculative bidders.

But critics including Worcester Civic Society remain unsettled at the way the sales were done.

Stephen Inman, civic society chairman, said: “If these books have no relevance and can be sold, then it begs the question why have we had them for the past 100 years or more?

"The fact is they were either bought or people have handed them over for the benefit of people in Worcestershire and now they have been sold.

“They could have been donated to the university, as universities are always looking for good books and well-stocked libraries.”

A county council spokesman said: “There is no statutory requirement regarding book stocks either being retained or disposed of within the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964.”

Worcester News

Sunday 17 April 2011

Private university company under investigation for deceiving students

Hive-Worcester

US government probes Apollo Group, owner of BPP University College, over admissions and financial aid practices

The company running one of only two for-profit universities in Britain is under investigation for deceiving students following an undercover operation by the US government.

Universities minister David Willetts awarded BPP University College its university status last year as part of a government drive to increase the number of private companies in further education.

Last week the government also announced plans to double the tuition fee loans available to students attending private universities, in an effort to encourage more companies to enter the education market. But the government's policy has been plunged into controversy after it emerged that Apollo Group, the American owner of the new university, is under investigation by US authorities over its "recruiting, admissions and financial aid practices".

The US Higher Learning Commission (HLC) launched its inquiry after it found evidence that Apollo had deceived prospective students during enrolment. The investigation by the US Government Accountability Office found officials at the firm's US universities, which include the University of Phoenix, were offering applicants exaggerated accounts of the potential for their careers after graduation. Private universities in America and the UK are almost entirely reliant for their funding on tuition fees, often paid by students through government loans.

Apollo has been ordered to answer a series of questions over its practices by the end of this month. The development is just the latest scandal to beset the company, which had an appeal for a conviction for securities fraud turned down last month; the company was found to have withheld a critical report from the US Department for Education from its shareholders. It has already paid around £8m to the government and is due to reimburse its investors around £130m.

Apollo Group's chief executive, Charles Edelstein, earns a $6m remuneration package, including bonuses and share options. The company's legal tangles will be an embarrassment for the British government, which is due to produce a white paper in which further encouragement for private universities is expected.

Willetts said earlier this year that one reason he wished to radically reduce state grants and deliver funding through loans was to level the playing field for private higher education providers. He said: "Currently, one of the main barriers to alternative providers is the teaching grant we pay to publicly funded higher education institutions [HEIs]. This enables HEIs to charge fees at a level that private providers could not match, and so gives publicly funded HEIs a significant advantage.

"Our funding reforms will remove this barrier, because all HEIs will – in future – receive most of their income from students via fees. This reform, of itself, opens up the system.

We will also allow alternative providers to access the generous system of student loans and grants, so their students will also be able to benefit from not having to pay upfront."

There are two private universities in England – Buckingham and BPP – with degree awarding powers. BPP, named after a UK company owned by Apollo, specialises in providing courses in law, banking and financial practice.

Concerns have already been raised that private universities will be in a position to "cherry pick" such lucrative degrees, for which high prices can be charged, while traditional universities continue to teach the full range of courses expected of them at a loss.

Shadow universities minister Gareth Thomas said he was concerned by the US developments and demanded Willetts slow down the pace of reform. "The government wouldn't need to be rushing to let more private providers into higher education if they hadn't got university finances into such a mess", he said.

Carl Lygo, chief executive of BPP, insisted his university was subject to a much higher degree of regulation than in America: "We are a degree awarding body which means we have a much tougher regulatory regime applied to us and a much different regime to that in the United States. I run the UK operation, BPP, which is entirely run by the UK team and has no direct control from the United States, and we are under the UK regulatory regime.

"At the time of the acquisition by Apollo, just less than two years ago, they undertook to accept that type of regulation would stay in place."

A spokesman for Apollo Group said: "We took the GAO's study very seriously and initiated an immediate internal investigation."

Guardian.co.uk

Wednesday 13 April 2011

IfL - The Institute for Learning - IfL updates eligibility for concessionary fees

hive-worcester

Following the Budget speech in which George Osborne announced that the personal allowance will be increased by £1,000 to £7,475 for the 2011-12 tax year, the Institute for Learning (IfL) has confirmed that part-time teachers and trainers whose annual income is below that threshold will be entitled to pay IfL’s concessionary membership fee, even if they have already renewed their membership at the standard rate.

From 1 April 2011, the standard membership fee for Members, Affiliates and Associates is £68, which is eligible for basic or higher rate tax relief if individual members pay. A concessionary rate of £45 is available for those earning less than the income tax threshold, unemployed members and members who are retired. Those in full-time teacher training pay £30.

The next membership period will be 18 months from 1 April 2011 through to 30 September 2012, when it will revert back to annual renewal, and this will be on 1 October each year.

IfL’s chief executive, Toni Fazaeli, said, “Following today’s Budget announcement, IfL has updated its arrangements so that any teacher or trainer whose annual earnings are at or below £7,475 is entitled to IfL’s concessionary membership rate of £45 for 18 months, from 1 April 2011 to 30 September 2012.  IfL is updating its communications for all members who have not yet renewed their IfL membership, as well as for new teachers or trainers joining IfL as their professional body.

“All part-time teachers and trainers who have already renewed their IfL membership for 2011-12 at the standard rate will receive a message from IfL confirming that if their yearly earnings are below the new personal allowance figure of £7,475 announced today by the Chancellor, IfL will reimburse the  £23 difference between the standard and concessionary fees for their 18 months' membership.”

Note

Detailed information about IfL’s transition to self-financing and members paying subscriptions is available on IfL’s website at http://www.ifl.ac.uk/membership/questions-and-answers

Tuesday 12 April 2011

Fees Row W.E.A.

hive-worcester

Last week,in The Guardian,  Andrew Mourant reported on the row between lecturers and their professional body, the Institute for Learning, over the rise in annual fees. 

Reply by Bernard Tucker:

Thank you for featuring the appalling business of the Institute for Learning's attempt to force its members to pay the annual subscription.

As a very part-time tutor for the Workers Educational Association (WEA), I was forced to join an organisation that has nothing to offer me; I ignore the endless bumph that is sent.

I earn a few hundred pounds a year after tax  from the WEA. I don't teach to supplement my pension, but in the hope of staving off dementia. An annual sub of £68 is out of proportion to what I earn and to what IfL is worth. I would rather give up teaching than pay it.

 

Sunday 10 April 2011

The Save EMA campaign proves peaceful protest works

Hive-Worcester

From James Mills, Guardian

Our peaceful direct action has achieved two government U-turns – but nowhere near the same media attention as the black bloc

The English poet and 19th century radical William Blake, who was largely unrecognised by the media in his own lifetime, wrote: "Great things are done when men and mountains meet; this is not done by jostling in the street." This seems to be ignored by the young, reckless radicals of our age, who do not realise that while the media give them all the attention they crave, it ignores the more successful peaceful protests.

Last week, for example, the Save EMA campaign managed to get two government U-turns. First, on Tuesday, we forced the government to provide support to the quarter of a million teenagers next year who are currently in receipt of the education maintenance allowance (EMA) by threatening them with legal action. Previously, the government had said it was going to axe this support for existing, as well as future, EMA recipients.

Then, on Thursday night, the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, called on the government to review its decision to scrap the EMA. This statement was in contrast to his initial response to the Save EMA protests at the London Conservative party conference in February, when his spokesperson dismissed us, saying the mayor "had no control over education policy". This was followed up on Saturday in the Guardian with news that Johnson had called Michael Gove personally to protest at EMA's demise.

According to a recent YouGov poll, the public support peaceful direct action rather than the violent alternative advocated by groups like black bloc. "All serious educational movements have in England been also social movements," wrote RH Tawney, something that can't be achieved if one ditches popular support.

Our campaign, predominantly made up of teenagers under the age of 18, has managed to do what the more radical campaigners could not. We have changed government policy and got the Tory mayor of London to express an opinion on an issue that only a month previously he had given the impression was not even pertinent to the capitol.

Nevertheless, the column inches dedicated to these achievements pale into insignificance when compared with the attention given to the more destructive demonstrators against government cuts. Of course, the fact that Johnson has taken six months to pick up the phone to call Gove on an issue that affects almost 100,000 Londoners, especially when compared with the rapid response shown by Ken Livingstone, is only a small step in the right direction. Getting financial support for a quarter of a million students next year is small beer when students starting in September will still not get EMA, while the EMA replacement scheme will still see its funding cut by 70% (instead of 90%).

Despite these small achievements, however, our campaign continues. It shows that by legitimate and peaceful direct action, rather than jostling in the street, change can be dragged, be it kicking and screaming, out of both a Conservative-led government and a Tory-run administration in London.

 

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Friday 8 April 2011

New Writers - Writer's Fayre in Worcester

Hive-Worcester

Writers can showcase their talents at a local authors' fayre.  This summer's event at the Perdiswell House pub on Droitwich Road will give local authors the opportunity to promote their books and sell signed copies to the public.

It's open to all authors of children's and adult books whether fiction or non-fiction. 

Illustrators are also welcome and while there is no charge for a table, authors can make a donation to charity.

It's the second time the event has been organised by former school librarian Linda Bromyard in aid of bereavement charity the Noah's Ark Trust.  Last year's successful fayre raised £216 for the trust. 

It takes place on Friday, June 17 from 6pm to 8pm and anyone interested in taking part can email lindabromyard@tiscali.co.uk

Article from The Standard, April 8th 2011

 

Thursday 7 April 2011

DfE: Education and Training Statistics for the United Kingdom 2010

hive-worcester

Released 31st March 2011

 

This is the fourteenth edition of Education and Training Statistics for the United Kingdom and is the fourth to be released via internet only. It provides statistics relating to education and training in the UK and includes Chapters relating to schools, post-compulsory education & training and qualifications & destinations, with annexes containing figures on education expenditure and UK population numbers. The 2009 edition was published on 26/11/2009.

Download Formats

PDF (4096Kb) | Explain formats

Additional information

EXCEL (Chapter 1 - Schools)

Additional information

EXCEL (Chapter 2 - Post Compulsory Education and Training)

Additional information

EXCEL (Chapter 3 - Qualifications and Destinations)

Additional information

EXCEL (Annexes - Annex A (Expenditure); Annex B (Population))

Reference ID

V01/2011

Coverage Country

UK

Date Released

31 March 2011

Main Category

Children, Education and Skills

Sub Category

School performance and standards    Click on subcategory link to see if there is later information

Type

Statistical Volume

Contact

Graham Devonshire  graham.devonshire@education.gsi.gov.uk  tel: 01325 735432

PreRelease Access

Click here

 

 

Article first appeared at Dept of Education, http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/VOL/v000992/index.shtml

Tuesday 5 April 2011

News Education Colleges College principals fear EMA replacements will not be enough

hive-worcester

Bursary scheme still entails a 60% cut in help for poorer students despite additional funding

The news that the education maintenance allowance was to be scrapped, announced in last year's spending review, left college principals feeling gloomy. The means-tested scheme, introduced in 2004, currently provides £10-£30 a week for 16- to 19-year-olds from low-income families to help them meet the costs of staying in education and training.

The replacement bursary scheme promised by the chancellor, George Osborne, offered little in the way of comfort; at just £78m it was a long way short of the £560m annual EMA fund. And without a guarantee of financial support, many in the sector feared young people would be discouraged from continuing their education.

So principals were surprised to learn that the government has suddenly managed to find some extra cash to support such students. In a partial u-turn, announced last week, the government said the replacement bursary fund would now be worth £180m annually, with the biggest amounts (£1,200 per person) given to young people with the greatest needs, such as those in care, leaving care, young parents and those with disabilities.

Under the new scheme, due to be launched in September, colleges will be able to use the remaining £165m to make discretionary payments to those from low-income families. Also promised is additional transitional funding of £194m, to ensure those already receiving EMA will still get help while they complete their course.

But while the additional funding is welcome, college principals point out that this is still a funding reduction of almost 60%, which means there will be substantially less to go round. As Stella Mbubaegbu, principal of Highbury College in Portsmouth, puts it: "While it is larger than expected, it is still considerably less than before, and essentially not enough to target all the disadvantaged young people who rely on its financial support to continue their education."

Many colleges are having to dig deep to subsidise students who would previously have qualified for EMA payments or, under the new funding arrangements, will be entitled to less. More...

Article first appeared at The Guardian,   http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/apr/05/colleges-ema-bursaries-students

Monday 4 April 2011

Closure of Lifelong Learning UK

hive-worcester

This note sets out the transfer of footprint responsibilities following the closure of LLUK on 31 March 2011.

In line with a schedule of work agreed by UKCES and government sponsors, the transfer of functions will be limited to:

UK-wide work that is funded and in hand relating to:

  • apprenticeship frameworks
  • qualifications
  • national occupational standards.

UK-wide functions that, due to identified activity in 2011-12, need a transitional home, while options for permanent transfer are concluded:

  • careers guidance
  • community learning and development (including Youth Work)
  • libraries, archives and information services

Further Education in England (including Work Based Learning and Adult and Community Learning), where capacity is to be retained on a permanent basis. This will maintain a high degree of continuity in the development of standards and qualifications, collection and analysis of LMI, specialist information and advice service and the SIR data collection

LSIS as sector led body will consult on the long term future of all the work that is transferring with all relevant stakeholders including through the relevant panels and committees, professional and sector representative bodies.

Whilst LLUK has worked closely with partners in Higher Education, including unions, to support workforce development no activity is currently being undertaken that is within the remit of the transfer agreement.

During this transition period LSIS will build on the work of LLUK to ensure coherence in standards, qualifications and frameworks across the constituencies that make up the lifelong learning sector.

By doing so, this will strengthen LSIS as a sector-led body and provide synergy with its existing programmes on continuing professional development (CPD), standards and workforce support.

In addition, LSIS welcomes the ongoing support and expertise of LLUK’s constituency panels and nations committees, and will work with them to agree the long term destination of the footprint.

A small team from LLUK will be transferring with the functions indicated, and this team’s expertise, insight and networks will be invaluable to, and warmly welcomed by, their new colleagues in LSIS.

LSIS will work on teaching and learning standards and qualifications with and through the Institute for Learning, as the professional body for teachers and trainers across the further education and skills sector.

It will inevitably take time for new arrangements to settle and all parties are encouraged to display patience and tact when dealing with staff who have been through considerable turmoil. Nevertheless, as LSIS takes over this critical work please be assured that the commitment to making the UK lifelong learning workforce the best in the world remains unshakeable.

LLUK legacy products will be available in electronic form from a dedicated website, www.lluklegacy.org. This site will hold a wide range of reports, case studies, factsheets, guides and other documents that LLUK produced, and which it is hoped will still be of value to sector employers and partner organisations, researchers and policy makers. The site will be live from the second week of April.

For more information please contact:

Susan Dakin on 02476 627964

susan.dakin@lsis.org.uk